Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42683352›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2026

Trajectory-Based Integration of Biomarker Dynamics and Clinical Features for Prognostic Prediction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Cineng Xu, Yun Yang, Dongmei Gou, Xiafei Wei, Qichao Yu, Jianguo Huang, Qingxian Cai, Hongzhong Zhou, Yong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cineng Xu *Institute for Hepatology, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yun Yang *Institute for Hepatology, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Dongmei GouInstitute for Hepatology, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xiafei WeiInstitute for Hepatology, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Qichao YuInstitute for Hepatology, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jianguo HuangInstitute for Hepatology, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Qingxian CaiInstitute for Hepatology, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Hongzhong ZhouDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Shenzhen Institute of Translational Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Medical Innovation Technology Transformation Center of Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-8426-6827
Yong XuInstitute for Hepatology, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Dynamic changes in circulating biomarkers may reflect tumor biology and host responses more accurately than static measurements. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a dynamic prognostic model for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by integrating longitudinal biomarker trajectories with clinical variables. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 379 patients with HCC treated at a single center in China. Latent class mixed models were used to identify circulating biomarker trajectories, which were integrated with clinical variables to construct the Integrated Multi-Biomarker Trajectory (IMBT) model. The model was compared with BCLC stage, a baseline biomarker model, and an AFP trajectory model. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were assessed using C-indices and time-dependent AUCs, calibration plots, calibration slopes and Brier scores, and decision curve analysis (DCA), respectively. Internal subgroup validation was performed in a treatment-defined subset of 327 patients from the same center and source cohort who received PD-(L)1 inhibitor plus molecular targeted therapy. A predefined AFP-negative subgroup analysis was performed using baseline/cycle-0 AFP <20 ng/mL, which was used only to define the subgroup. Results: AFP, D-dimer, and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) trajectories independently predicted PFS and OS. Sharp-falling AFP trajectories were associated with favorable outcomes, whereas persistently high or rising AFP and D-dimer trajectories and lower ALC trajectories indicated poorer prognosis. The IMBT model achieved C-indices of 0.741 for PFS and 0.728 for OS. For PFS, the C-index exceeded those of the BCLC, baseline biomarker, and AFP trajectory models by 0.108, 0.124, and 0.039, respectively. The corresponding C-indices were 0.730 and 0.724 in the internal PD-(L)1 plus MTT subgroup. Calibration slopes at 12 and 24 months were 1.176 and 1.509 for PFS and 0.898 and 1.014 for OS, respectively, while DCA demonstrated positive net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. In AFP-negative patients, the PFS/OS C-indices were 0.647/0.634 in the full cohort and 0.692/0.683 in the PD-(L)1 plus MTT subgroup. Conclusion: Longitudinal trajectories of AFP, D-dimer, and ALC provide independent and complementary prognostic information. By integrating dynamic biomarker patterns with clinical features, the IMBT model improved risk stratification compared with conventional staging, baseline biomarker, and AFP-only trajectory models. These findings support further prospective external validation of the model for dynamic prognostic assessment and risk-adapted monitoring in HCC.

Indexed as

absolute lymphocyte countalpha-fetoproteinD-dimerhepatocellular carcinomaoverall survivalprogression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID42683352
PMCPMC13532652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.