Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42683331›Full record

ReviewIranian journal of basic medical sciences2026

Comparative evaluation of cell types for endothelialization in cardiovascular tissue engineering.

Mohamed Elkawafi, Sufyan Elhashani, Atya Kushan, Abdulla M Elmansoury, Siraj Alabeedi, Mahmoud Aloriby

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Iranian journal of basic medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohamed ElkawafiBasic Medical Sciences Program, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Libyan International University, Benghazi, Libya.
Sufyan ElhashaniDivision of Medical Education, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Atya KushanBasic Medical Sciences Program, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Libyan International University, Benghazi, Libya.
Abdulla M ElmansouryBasic Medical Sciences Program, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Libyan International University, Benghazi, Libya.
Siraj AlabeediProgram of Medicine, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Libyan International University, Benghazi, Libya.
Mahmoud AloribyDepartment of Pathology, Medical Center, Libyan International University, Benghazi, Libya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering represents a promising approach to overcome the limitations of current vascular grafts by promoting endothelialization. However, the successful fabrication of small-diameter (<6 mm) tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs) that maintain the desired mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and long-term patency of native vessels remains a significant challenge. The development of an ideal TEVG depends largely on achieving complete endothelial coverage using appropriate autologous cells that can mimic the functional properties of native endothelium. Several studies have highlighted various autologous and stem cell sources with potential for graft endothelialization, including endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs), human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Despite extensive preclinical progress, the most suitable cell source for generating stable and functional endothelium in small-diameter TEVGs remains unclear, representing a key gap in current knowledge. This review therefore evaluates the principal cell types investigated in cardiovascular tissue engineering, outlining their main advantages, limitations, and translational potential. Overall, a critical comparison of these cell sources highlights the need for further research to determine their long-term safety, durability, and suitability for clinical application in the construction of functional and durable TEVGs.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular tissue-engineeringEmbryonic stem cells (escs)Endothelial progenitor cells- (epcs)Human umbilical vein-endothelial cells (huvecs)Induced pluripotent stem cells (ipscs)Mesenchymal stem cells- (mscs)

Identifiers

PMID42683331
PMCPMC13531683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.