ReviewIranian journal of basic medical sciences2026
Comparative evaluation of cell types for endothelialization in cardiovascular tissue engineering.
Review in Iranian journal of basic medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue engineering represents a promising approach to overcome the limitations of current vascular grafts by promoting endothelialization. However, the successful fabrication of small-diameter (<6 mm) tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs) that maintain the desired mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and long-term patency of native vessels remains a significant challenge. The development of an ideal TEVG depends largely on achieving complete endothelial coverage using appropriate autologous cells that can mimic the functional properties of native endothelium. Several studies have highlighted various autologous and stem cell sources with potential for graft endothelialization, including endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs), human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Despite extensive preclinical progress, the most suitable cell source for generating stable and functional endothelium in small-diameter TEVGs remains unclear, representing a key gap in current knowledge. This review therefore evaluates the principal cell types investigated in cardiovascular tissue engineering, outlining their main advantages, limitations, and translational potential. Overall, a critical comparison of these cell sources highlights the need for further research to determine their long-term safety, durability, and suitability for clinical application in the construction of functional and durable TEVGs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.