ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Meditation styles are highly discriminable from EEG at the subject level with limited generalization across the population: a machine-learning study.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meditation has been associated with improvements in attention, emotional regulation, and mental wellbeing, motivating increasing interest in objective methods for assessing meditative states. In this study, we investigate whether EEG-based machine learning can reliably distinguish between multiple meditation styles and mind-wandering states. EEG data were recorded from experienced meditators performing three meditation styles, Shamatha, Vipassana, and Metta, together with an eyes-closed mind-wandering condition. EEG signals were preprocessed to remove artifacts, and features were extracted from frequency, time-frequency, and time domains. Classification was evaluated using both intra-subject and inter-subject strategies with multiple machine learning classifiers. Results demonstrate high intra-subject classification accuracy across meditation-vs.-mind-wandering and meditation-style comparisons, indicating strongly discriminative subject-specific neural signatures. In contrast, inter-subject performance decreased substantially, particularly for distinguishing meditation styles, suggesting considerable inter-individual variability in meditation-related EEG patterns. Furthermore, temporal analysis revealed that classification performance increases over time in some comparisons, particularly in VIP/MW, suggesting that the neural distinctions between certain meditation states may become more pronounced over time. Additionally, t-SNE visualization showed clear within-subject clustering but increased overlap across subjects, explaining the reduced inter-subject generalization. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of EEG-based machine learning for personalized assessment and monitoring of meditative states while emphasizing the challenges of developing subject-independent meditation classification systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.