Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42683236›Full record

ReviewActa ortopedica brasileira2026

EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEWS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY: HYALURONIC ACID INFILTRATION FOR ELBOW EPICONDYLITIS IN ADULTS.

Gustavo de Mello Ribeiro Pinto, Leonardo Zanesco, Marcus Vinícius Galvão Amaral, Fábio Teruo Matsunaga, João Artur Bonadiman, João Felipe de Medeiros, Marcelo Costa de Oliveira Campos, Eduardo Angeli Malavolta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gustavo de Mello Ribeiro PintoUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4079-3100
Leonardo ZanescoUniversidade de Sao Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-7298
Marcus Vinícius Galvão AmaralCentro de Cirurgia do Ombro e Cotovelo, Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia Jamil Haddad, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7301-3644
Fábio Teruo MatsunagaUniversidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Departamento de Ortopedia, Grupo de Ombro e Cotovelo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7328-1446
João Artur BonadimanInstituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Sao Vicente de Paulo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-4461
João Felipe de MedeirosUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4745-4566
Marcelo Costa de Oliveira CamposUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4498-2360
Eduardo Angeli MalavoltaUniversidade de Sao Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-6445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Elbow epicondylitis is a common tendinopathy in adults, and infiltration is frequently used when initial conservative treatment fails. Hyaluronic acid and corticosteroids are among the most widely used injectable agents, but their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. Methods: We performed an evidence-based review of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews comparing hyaluronic acid with corticosteroid injections for adult elbow epicondylitis. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and BVS were searched through August 2025. Main outcomes were pain and elbow function; risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using Cochrane and GRADE approaches. Results: Of 94 records, three studies met the eligibility criteria (one systematic review and two randomized trials), all focused on lateral epicondylitis. Very low-quality evidence suggests that hyaluronic acid provides greater improvement in pain and function than corticosteroids from 8 weeks to 6 months in acute cases, whereas in chronic lateral epicondylitis, corticosteroid injections appear more effective than hyaluronic acid for pain relief and functional recovery up to 6 weeks. Conclusions: Current evidence, though very limited and at high risk of bias, supports preferential use of corticosteroids for short-term symptom control and hyaluronic acid for medium- to long-term pain and functional improvement in adult lateral epicondylitis.

Indexed as

CorticosteroidElbowHyaluronic AcidInjectionsLateral EpicondylitisTennis Elbow

Identifiers

PMID42683236
PMCPMC13532833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.