ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Complication Rates of Casts versus Bulky Dressings after Syndactyly Release.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The arms are commonly immobilized in a cast after syndactyly release. Despite this practice, there is little research examining complications from cast immobilization. This study compares the complication rates of congenital syndactyly release using casts and bulky soft dressings. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing syndactyly release. Patients were included if they underwent a primary release of congenital syndactyly and excluded if they had a noncongenital cause. Data regarding surgical procedures, medical complications, and unplanned caregiver phone calls and clinic/emergency department (ED) visits related to the dressings were recorded. Results: Ninety-five patients met inclusion criteria, representing 143 hands placed in casts and 25 in bulky dressings. No significant differences in surgical or medical complications were detected. The most common complications across all patients were web creep (10.1%), hypertrophic scarring (12.5%), and scar contracture (6.0%). Unplanned ED visits were noted in 1.4% of casts and 4.0% of bulky dressings and unplanned clinic visits were noted in 7.0% of casts and 8.0% of bulky dressings. Only 7.0% of casts and 8.0% of bulky dressings required replacement. Caregiver phone calls were seen for 14.0% of casted hands and 24.0% of bulky dressings. Regardless of dressing, hypertrophic scarring was more prevalent in non-White patients (22.9% versus 7.9%, Conclusions: There is no significant difference in complications, phone calls, or unplanned clinic/ED visits between patients undergoing congenital syndactyly release placed in a cast or bulky soft dressings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.