Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42683193›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2026

Low-dose morphine and airway sensations in refractory chronic cough: a randomised control trial.

Bashar D Al-Sheklly, Joanne Mitchell, Kimberley Holt, Rachel Dockry, Huda Badri, Imran Satia, Terri Collier, Shilpi Sen, Jaclyn A Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bashar D Al-ShekllyManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Joanne MitchellManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Kimberley HoltManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0413-8085
Rachel DockryManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0908-3362
Huda BadriManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Imran SatiaDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4206-6000
Terri CollierManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Shilpi SenManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Jaclyn A SmithManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8837-4928

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Low-dose morphine is recommended as an antitussive agent for refractory chronic cough (RCC), although its precise mechanism of action remains unknown. We hypothesised that noxious airway sensations ( Methods: 22 RCC patients (median age 65 years; 83% female) reporting a clinical response to low-dose morphine withdrew from therapy and enrolled in a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover trial comparing the effects of their usual dose of morphine with those of a matched placebo. The sensations evoked by citric acid inhalation were assessed at baseline and at the end of each 5-7-day treatment period. The efficacy of morphine, compared with placebo, was assessed by objective cough monitoring and patient-reported outcomes at the same time points. Findings: Compared with placebo, low-dose morphine improved the rating of all sensations provoked by citric acid inhalation (all p<0.05), but the cough threshold (C2) was not changed (p=0.61). 24-hour cough frequency was reduced by 71.8% with low-dose morphine, compared with placebo treatment (p<0.001), and all patient-reported outcomes significantly improved. Interpretation: This trial suggests that the antitussive action of low-dose morphine may be a consequence of modulation of noxious airway sensations and provides the first objective evidence of its efficacy in RCC patients reporting a clinical response.

Identifiers

PMID42683193
PMCPMC13531274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.