ArticleLearning health systems2026
Evaluation of a Real-Time Knowledge Exchange Network Supporting Syphilis Rapid Testing and Immediate Treatment in Seven Public Health Units in Ontario, Canada.
Article in Learning health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Syphilis Point of care Rapid testing and Immediate Treatment Evaluation (SPRITE) is a collaborative, community-based initiative that strengthens syphilis prevention and control in Ontario, Canada through flexible outreach nursing and point-of-care testing (POCT) and immediate treatment. Seven public health units (PHUs) partnered with 86 community-based organizations (CBOs) to deliver syphilis/HIV POCTs in underserved settings. This study evaluated a real-time knowledge exchange network that supported syphilis POCT implementation and capacity-building across PHUs and CBOs in Ontario. Methods: The evaluation was a mixed-methods case study using surveys and interviews focusing on the community of practice (CoP), community engagement, and knowledge mobilization. It considers SPRITE CoP activities from beginning of implementation (mid 2023) to the Fall of 2025. Results: The CoP, consisting of public health nurses, researchers, and knowledge specialists, supported engagement, co-development, and peer learning. Members shared lessons learned, built partnerships, and supported each other in navigating challenges. Flexibility in funding allowed innovation by CoP members in their CBO engagement efforts but also created some uncertainty and possible confusion. CoP members were overall satisfied with CoP functioning, and CBOs surveyed appeared knowledgeable and engaged in SPRITE. Discussion: The CoP model, while distinct from traditional public health CoPs, proved effective in fostering engagement, resource development, and knowledge mobilization. Lessons learned and tools developed provide guidance for future POCT efforts. Improvements should include clearer goals, stronger facilitation, and structured engagement strategies. Addressing funding stability, particularly for POCT services and CoP management roles, is essential. Strengthening CBO partnerships through incentives and bi-directional information sharing will further enhance POCT and syphilis prevention. This evaluation underscores the importance of flexible yet accountable approaches to knowledge mobilization and POCT implementation in diverse public health contexts. Continued investment in collaborative networks like SPRITE remains critical to advancing syphilis elimination efforts across Ontario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.