Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42683113›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2026

Evaluation of a Real-Time Knowledge Exchange Network Supporting Syphilis Rapid Testing and Immediate Treatment in Seven Public Health Units in Ontario, Canada.

Megan Ann Carter, Sara Tryon, Mary Southall, Kandace Belanger, Mary France Caron-Bruneau, Anne Charron, Sandra Dereski, Michael Evans, Natasha Larkin, Kassandra Plante and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Megan Ann CarterSoutheast Public Health Kingston Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7625-3392
Sara TryonSoutheast Public Health Kingston Canada.
Mary SouthallSoutheast Public Health Kingston Canada.
Kandace BelangerThunder Bay District Health Unit Thunder Bay Canada.
Mary France Caron-BruneauNortheastern Public Health Timmins Ontario Canada.
Anne CharronSoutheast Public Health Kingston Canada.
Sandra DereskiAlgoma Public Health Sault Ste. Marie Canada.
Michael EvansRenfrew County and District Health Unit Pembroke Canada.
Natasha LarkinStreet Health Centre, Kingston Community Health Centres Kingston Canada.
Kassandra PlanteNortheastern Public Health Timmins Ontario Canada.
Melanie St JohnRenfrew County and District Health Unit Pembroke Canada.
Nicole SzumlanskiSoutheast Public Health Kingston Canada.
Lucy MackrellDepartment of Public Health Sciences Queen's University Kingston Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0097-0811
Sahar SaeedDepartment of Public Health Sciences Queen's University Kingston Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0224-379X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Syphilis Point of care Rapid testing and Immediate Treatment Evaluation (SPRITE) is a collaborative, community-based initiative that strengthens syphilis prevention and control in Ontario, Canada through flexible outreach nursing and point-of-care testing (POCT) and immediate treatment. Seven public health units (PHUs) partnered with 86 community-based organizations (CBOs) to deliver syphilis/HIV POCTs in underserved settings. This study evaluated a real-time knowledge exchange network that supported syphilis POCT implementation and capacity-building across PHUs and CBOs in Ontario. Methods: The evaluation was a mixed-methods case study using surveys and interviews focusing on the community of practice (CoP), community engagement, and knowledge mobilization. It considers SPRITE CoP activities from beginning of implementation (mid 2023) to the Fall of 2025. Results: The CoP, consisting of public health nurses, researchers, and knowledge specialists, supported engagement, co-development, and peer learning. Members shared lessons learned, built partnerships, and supported each other in navigating challenges. Flexibility in funding allowed innovation by CoP members in their CBO engagement efforts but also created some uncertainty and possible confusion. CoP members were overall satisfied with CoP functioning, and CBOs surveyed appeared knowledgeable and engaged in SPRITE. Discussion: The CoP model, while distinct from traditional public health CoPs, proved effective in fostering engagement, resource development, and knowledge mobilization. Lessons learned and tools developed provide guidance for future POCT efforts. Improvements should include clearer goals, stronger facilitation, and structured engagement strategies. Addressing funding stability, particularly for POCT services and CoP management roles, is essential. Strengthening CBO partnerships through incentives and bi-directional information sharing will further enhance POCT and syphilis prevention. This evaluation underscores the importance of flexible yet accountable approaches to knowledge mobilization and POCT implementation in diverse public health contexts. Continued investment in collaborative networks like SPRITE remains critical to advancing syphilis elimination efforts across Ontario.

Indexed as

community of practiceknowledge mobilizationlocal public health agencypoint‐of‐care testing and treatmentsyphilis prevention

Identifiers

PMID42683113
PMCPMC13531007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.