ArticleRadiology research and practice2026
Biomechanical Assessment Using MRI of Custom-Made Bovine Pericardial Tubes as Potential Aortic Replacements.
Article in Radiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Autologous materials for vessel replacement in infected fields have high morbidity and mortality rates. Custom-made bovine pericardial tubes (CMBPTs) offer a promising alternative with advantages such as reliability, strength, and availability. However, limited biomechanical data hinder predictions of in vivo performance. This study evaluates the physiological strain and distensibility of CMBPTs in vitro under simulated abdominal aortic flow using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A secondary objective is to compare strain and distensibility calculations using phase contrast (PC) and steady-state free precession (SSFP) MRI sequences. Methods: Seven CMBPTs were tested under physiological aortic conditions with a pulsatile flow rate of 1650 mL/min using in vitro MRI. PC and SSFP sequences were employed, with PC estimating velocity and strain, while SSFP assessed strain separately. Image analysis was performed using QIR-MR software. Results: Strain was measured using magnitude images. The mean maximum cross-sectional areas were 419 ± 22.1 (PC) and 438.4 ± 24.3 mm Conclusion: CMBPTs exhibit biomechanical properties similar to the abdominal aorta, suggesting potential for vascular applications. Both MRI sequences provided comparable results, supporting their reliability. Further research is needed to confirm long-term performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.