ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026
Genomic exploration and
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: Whole-genome sequencing, functional annotation, antiSMASH v7.0.1-based biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) prediction, LC-MS/MS metabolomic profiling, SwissADME analysis, target prediction, disease association mapping, molecular docking against PTGS2 (PDB: 5IKR), and PASS bioactivity prediction were performed to prioritize putative bioactive metabolites. Results: Genome analysis identified 29 predicted biosynthetic gene clusters, including clusters associated with geosmin, ectoine, albaflavenone, hopene, coelichelin, and SapB, together with several cryptic clusters exhibiting low similarity to known pathways. LC-MS/MS metabolomic profiling provided experimental support for active secondary metabolite production under the cultivation conditions employed. Computational prioritization identified PTGS2 (COX-2) as a biologically relevant target. Molecular docking demonstrated favorable binding affinities and interaction profiles for several predicted metabolites within the PTGS2 catalytic pocket. PASS analysis further suggested potential anticancer-related biological activities that require experimental validation. Discussion: These findings demonstrate the utility of integrating genome mining, metabolomic profiling, and computational drug discovery for prioritizing natural-product candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.