ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Adaptation and field testing of an observational assessment tool for autism diagnosis in Western Kenya.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The development and implementation of culturally appropriate, easy-to-administer, open-source assessment tools are critical for advancing autism detection and research in low- and middle-income countries. Methods: The ASD-PEDS, an open-source semi-structured observational tool for assessing autism-related behaviors in young children, was adapted for use in Kenya via iterative refinement throughout the process of forward-backward translation (English-Kiswahili), cognitive interviews with clinicians and caregivers, and field testing to ensure cultural relevance. Results: Cognitive interviews revealed culturally normative early social communication and play skills aligned with key behaviors assessed by the ASD-PEDS. Field testing further identified targets for adaptation including development of bilingual administration guidelines and cultural modifications to assessment activities. During field testing, ASD-PEDS categorical risk matched the child's diagnosis in 100% of cases, demonstrating initial alignment with clinical classification. Conclusions: With minor adaptations, the ASD-PEDS demonstrates preliminary feasibility as an observational assessment tool to support standardized autism evaluation of young children in low-resource settings. Given the early-stage nature of this adaptation study, findings should be interpreted as preliminary. Study of psychometric performance in a heterogeneous larger sample of children is a necessary next step for cultural validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.