ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026
Edible interfaces based on chitosan, cellulose, and hemicellulose: from food preservation to bioactive delivery and post-consumption relevance.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing demand for sustainable, functional, and safe food packaging has driven the development of edible polysaccharide-based films and coatings. Cellulose, hemicellulose, and chitosan serve as versatile platforms for constructing multifunctional interfaces that integrate preservation, bioactive delivery, and post-consumption functionality. This review systematically examines strategies to enhance mechanical strength, barrier performance, water resistance, and controlled release through nanoreinforcement, polymer blending, plasticization, crosslinking, and processing optimization. Active preservation functions, including antimicrobial, antifungal, and antioxidant activities, are contextualized with real food applications such as fruits, vegetables, meat, dairy, and lipid-rich products. Special attention is given to bioactive loading and controlled release of phenolics, flavonoids, essential oils, probiotics, and prebiotic xylooligosaccharides, while critically distinguishing formulation-level evidence, such as release in food simulants or simulated gastrointestinal fluids, from unvalidated claims of gut microbiota modulation or nutritional benefit. Food matrix-specific validation illustrates how interface design must match the dominant spoilage pathways of target foods. The post-consumption fate and microbiota-oriented relevance of edible films are discussed as emerging possibilities, with emphasis on the current lack of direct colonic fermentation, animal, or human intervention evidence for many reported systems. Furthermore, advances in intelligent, responsive, and self-healing edible interfaces are explored, along with safety, edibility, sensory acceptability, regulatory considerations, and industrial scalability. Finally, design guidelines for next-generation edible food interfaces are proposed, integrating material selection, polymer engineering, active cargo design, and nutrition-oriented validation. This comprehensive framework provides a roadmap for developing edible interfaces that can improve food quality and sustainability while supporting future investigation of their nutrition-related and post-consumption relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.