ArticleJPGN reports2026
Clinician perspectives on infusion site-of-care shifts in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: An anonymous national web-based survey.
Article in JPGN reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Commercial payers and pharmacy benefit managers use site-of-care and specialty drug distribution policies (including white bagging and brown bagging) that can redirect infusion-based biologic therapies from hospital outpatient departments to alternate settings. We conducted an anonymous web-based survey distributed via a national pediatric gastroenterology (GI) listserv (February 13-27, 2026) to characterize perceived access barriers and decision drivers for acceptable infusion sites among pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinicians. Among 100 respondents, prior authorization/payer friction was most frequently rated as a major/severe pain point (66%). The highest-rated decision drivers were reaction management capability (88% very/extremely important), reliable communication back to the GI team (88%), patient experience (88%), and pediatric infusion expertise (87%). These findings highlight administrative burden as the dominant barrier and underscore the importance of safety capability and bidirectional care integration when pediatric patients with IBD are shifted across sites of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.