Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42682983›Full record

ArticleJPGN reports2026

Clinician perspectives on infusion site-of-care shifts in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: An anonymous national web-based survey.

Brad Pasternak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPGN reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Brad PasternakDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology Phoenix Children's Hospital Phoenix Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1912-871X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commercial payers and pharmacy benefit managers use site-of-care and specialty drug distribution policies (including white bagging and brown bagging) that can redirect infusion-based biologic therapies from hospital outpatient departments to alternate settings. We conducted an anonymous web-based survey distributed via a national pediatric gastroenterology (GI) listserv (February 13-27, 2026) to characterize perceived access barriers and decision drivers for acceptable infusion sites among pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinicians. Among 100 respondents, prior authorization/payer friction was most frequently rated as a major/severe pain point (66%). The highest-rated decision drivers were reaction management capability (88% very/extremely important), reliable communication back to the GI team (88%), patient experience (88%), and pediatric infusion expertise (87%). These findings highlight administrative burden as the dominant barrier and underscore the importance of safety capability and bidirectional care integration when pediatric patients with IBD are shifted across sites of care.

Indexed as

brown baggingcare coordinationpayer mandatesspecialty pharmacywhite bagging

Identifiers

PMID42682983
PMCPMC13530913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.