Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42682969›Full record

ArticleMedicine international

Methotrexate subcutaneous injection for the initial treatment of rheumatoid arthritis can achieve earlier remission compared with oral administration.

Yukie Saio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yukie SaioDepartment of Rheumatology, Toho Hospital, Midori, Gunma 379-2311, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Japan, subcutaneous methotrexate (SC-MTX) administration was introduced in 2022; however, available data regarding its use as an initial treatment or its effectiveness when switching from oral MTX remain limited. The present study aimed to examine the introduction timing and effects of a SC-MTX injection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The oral MTX administration group (n=202, O-MTX), initial SC-MTX group (n=59, SC-MTX) and SC-MTX-switched group (n=25, SWITCH) were compared for the disease activity score in the disease activity score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), remission rate of MTX, combination rate of biological agents and JAK inhibitors, the discontinuation rate (DR) of glucocorticoids, alanine aminotransferase, low-density lipoprotein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin, white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, DR of medications. A survey on SC-MTX self-injection was also conducted. SC-MTX achieved greater improvements in both HAQ and DAS28-CRP than O-MTX, and the difference became evident by 12 weeks following treatment introduction. In SWITCH, the disease activity also decreased after switching. The proportions of remission cases on MTX monotherapy at 24 weeks in the O-MTX, SC-MTX and SWITCH groups were 31.3, 65.96 and 33.33%, respectively and the DR rates of glucocorticoids in these groups were 59.3, 85.7 and 50%, respectively. As regards safety, no differences were noted in renal function, liver function, or changes in blood cells. According to the questionnaire for the usability of the SC-MTX self-injection, patients were very satisfied. On the whole, the present study demonstrates that in the treatment of RA, the initial introduction of SC-MTX is considered very useful, particularly in patients with high disease activity.

Indexed as

difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritisdisease-modifying anti rheumatic drugsmethotrexaterheumatoid arthritistreatment response

Identifiers

PMID42682969
PMCPMC13531110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.