ArticleChemical science2026
Teaching diffusion models physics: reinforcement learning for physically valid diffusion-based docking.
Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular docking aims to predict the binding conformation of a small molecule to its protein target. Recent work has proposed diffusion models for this task, from rigid-body docking that diffuses over ligand degrees of freedom to co-folding approaches that jointly generate protein structure and ligand pose. However, diffusion-based docking models have been shown to frequently produce physically implausible poses and fail to consistently recover key protein-ligand interactions. To address this, we introduce a reinforcement learning framework for training diffusion-based docking models directly on non-differentiable objectives. Fine-tuning DiffDock-Pocket for physical validity with our approach substantially increases the number of generated poses that are physically valid and interaction-preserving, with no increase in inference-time compute. Importantly, this comes without sacrificing structural accuracy; in fact, our approach increases the proportion of structures with near-native poses. These effects are most pronounced for protein targets that are dissimilar to the training data. Our fine-tuned DiffDock-Pocket model outperforms both classical docking algorithms and machine learning-based approaches on the PoseBusters set. Our results demonstrate that reinforcement learning can teach diffusion-based docking models to better respect physical constraints and recover key interactions, without the requirement to rely on inference-time corrections.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.