Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42682930›Full record

ArticleChemical science2026

Teaching diffusion models physics: reinforcement learning for physically valid diffusion-based docking.

J Henry Broster, Bojana Popovic, Diana Kondinskaia, Charlotte M Deane, Fergus Imrie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J Henry BrosterDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3LB UK imrie@stats.ox.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1578-7488
Bojana PopovicCambridge Crystallographic Data Centre Cambridge CB2 1EZ UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0756-5149
Diana KondinskaiaCambridge Crystallographic Data Centre Cambridge CB2 1EZ UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8850-9091
Charlotte M DeaneDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3LB UK imrie@stats.ox.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-2252
Fergus ImrieDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3LB UK imrie@stats.ox.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6241-0123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular docking aims to predict the binding conformation of a small molecule to its protein target. Recent work has proposed diffusion models for this task, from rigid-body docking that diffuses over ligand degrees of freedom to co-folding approaches that jointly generate protein structure and ligand pose. However, diffusion-based docking models have been shown to frequently produce physically implausible poses and fail to consistently recover key protein-ligand interactions. To address this, we introduce a reinforcement learning framework for training diffusion-based docking models directly on non-differentiable objectives. Fine-tuning DiffDock-Pocket for physical validity with our approach substantially increases the number of generated poses that are physically valid and interaction-preserving, with no increase in inference-time compute. Importantly, this comes without sacrificing structural accuracy; in fact, our approach increases the proportion of structures with near-native poses. These effects are most pronounced for protein targets that are dissimilar to the training data. Our fine-tuned DiffDock-Pocket model outperforms both classical docking algorithms and machine learning-based approaches on the PoseBusters set. Our results demonstrate that reinforcement learning can teach diffusion-based docking models to better respect physical constraints and recover key interactions, without the requirement to rely on inference-time corrections.

Identifiers

PMID42682930
PMCPMC13531412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.