ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Local and free flaps in cutaneous nasal oncologic reconstruction.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconstruction of cutaneous nasal defects following resection of sinonasal malignancies remains a complex surgical challenge because of the nose's intricate anatomy and its critical aesthetic and functional roles. Multiple reconstructive options are available to restore nasal integrity; however, no universally accepted optimal approach exists. This review summarizes contemporary approaches to oncologic nasal reconstruction using local, regional, and free flaps, with emphasis on the aesthetic subunit principle as the foundation of surgical planning. Reconstructive decision-making is guided by defect size, depth, and subunit involvement, as well as patient-specific factors such as comorbidities, prior irradiation, and the anticipated need for adjuvant therapy. Local and regional flaps, including the nasolabial flap and the paramedian forehead flap, are preferred for small to moderate cutaneous nasal defects, whereas free flaps, particularly the radial forearm flap, provide reliable solutions for extensive composite defects. Immediate reconstruction is generally associated with superior aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial outcomes; however, delayed reconstruction may be appropriate in selected cases requiring margin surveillance or additional oncologic assessment. This review aims to provide practical insights into reconstructive decision-making based on the available literature and clinical experience, with the goal of optimizing aesthetic, functional, and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing oncologic nasal reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.