ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2026
Diet-gut microbiota-immune-brain interactions in aging: mechanistic pathways and clinical implications.
Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With rising life expectancy and global population aging, cognitive decline has become a major and growing public health challenge. Advances in nutritional neuroscience highlight the gut microbiota-immune-brain axis as a key biological pathway through which diet may influence cognitive function during aging. The gut microbiota, a metabolically active ecosystem, responds dynamically to habitual dietary patterns and produces bioactive metabolites capable of modulating immune signaling, neuroinflammation, and neuronal function. Diets rich in microbiota-modulating foods (e.g., dietary fiber, polyphenols, prebiotics, and probiotics) promote beneficial microbial communities. These communities support short-chain fatty acid production, maintain intestinal barrier integrity, and regulate systemic immune responses, processes increasingly associated with cognitive resilience in aging populations. In contrast, Western-style dietary patterns characterized by high intakes of saturated fats and refined sugars are linked to microbial dysbiosis, impaired gut barrier function, metabolic endotoxemia, and chronic low-grade inflammation, which may contribute to neuroinflammatory pathways involved in cognitive decline. This narrative review synthesizes evidence from observational studies, dietary intervention trials, and mechanistic animal models to examine how diet-driven alterations in gut microbiota composition and microbial metabolites interact with and modulate immune pathways to influence brain function in aging populations. Although emerging evidence supports the biological plausibility of this axis in cognitive health, current evidence remains constrained by methodological heterogeneity, short intervention durations, limited functional insight, and substantial inter-individual variability in microbiota responsiveness. In particular, much of the mechanistic understanding derives from preclinical research, while human evidence remains largely associative and insufficient to establish causal pathways. Future research should integrate longitudinal cohort designs, harmonized cognitive assessment tools, and repeated profiling of microbial and host metabolites to clarify the functional and causal links between diet, microbial metabolism, immune regulation, and brain aging. A more integrated understanding of these interactions may help inform targeted, microbiome-informed nutritional strategies for supporting healthy cognitive aging, while maintaining appropriate caution in clinical interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.