ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Employing Metagenomics Capture targeted next-generation sequencing for the etiological diagnosis of bloodstream infections.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) represent a significant public health concern. Metagenomic Capture targeted next-generation sequencing technology, as a newly emerging method for pathogen detection, has been applied in the etiological diagnosis of various infectious diseases and demonstrates good diagnostic efficacy. However, there is relatively limited research on the diagnostic value of this technology for the etiological diagnosis of BSIs. Methods: A comprehensive retrospective analysis was performed on patients suspected of having BSIs who were admitted to the Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University in 2024. These patients underwent both blood culture analysis and Metagenomic Capture targeted next-generation sequencing technology for diagnostic testing, and a detailed comparison of the results was conducted. Results: It was found that the Metagenomic Capture-targeted next-generation sequencing method has a shorter time to result [1.33 (1.18 - 1.69) vs 2.73 (1.89 - 3.84) days, Conclusions: Metagenomic Capture targeted next-generation sequencing technology is a promising tool for pathogen identification in BSIs, offering substantial methodological advantages in terms of turnaround time, detection breadth, and sensitivity. These diagnostic performance characteristics support its potential utility in clinical microbiology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.