Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42682784›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2026

Exhaled breath profiling for early silicosis detection in workers at risk: a pilot study.

Nele Van Loon, David Ruttens, Mathieu Verbrugghe, Kathleen Zwijsen, Pierre Van Damme, Thérèse Lapperre, Kevin Lamote

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nele Van LoonLaboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4812-0575
David RuttensDepartment of Lung Diseases, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Mathieu VerbruggheDepartment of Research and Development, Mensura Occupational Health Service, Brussels, Belgium.
Kathleen ZwijsenLaboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6197-3987
Pierre Van DammeCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination @ Vaccinopolis, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Thérèse LapperreLaboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5176-0101
Kevin LamoteLaboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9500-7461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Silicosis remains a major occupational health concern in respirable crystalline silica (RCS)-exposed workers. Exhaled breath analysis using volatile organic compound (VOC) profiling has emerged as a promising noninvasive approach for early disease detection. This feasibility study evaluated multicapillary column/ion mobility spectrometry (MCC/IMS)-based VOC profiling for differentiating silicosis from other respiratory conditions and healthy controls in an occupational health setting. Methods: We conducted a multicentre, cross-sectional observational study employing MCC/IMS to identify VOC patterns. Breath data were reduced to principal components and used in logistic lasso regression to develop predictive models. Internal and external validation assessed model performance, and subgroup analyses explored the impact of comorbidities and spirometry abnormalities. Results: A total of 185 participants were enrolled, including 24 COPD patients, 26 with benign asbestos-related diseases (BARD) and 32 with confirmed silicosis, alongside 25 healthy controls and 78 RCS-exposed controls. Silicosis was distinguished from BARD and COPD with 100% and 87.5% accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC Conclusion: MCC/IMS-based breath analysis shows promise as a rapid, portable and noninvasive technique for early detection of silicosis in RCS-exposed workers. Future research should validate these findings in larger cohorts, integrate cross-validation of candidate biomarkers across analytical platforms and establish standardised protocols to enable routine implementation in occupational health surveillance.

Identifiers

PMID42682784
PMCPMC13531254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.