ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026
Is age a critical indicator for determining the optimal abstinence duration in patients undergoing sperm acquisition?
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sperm cryopreservation is increasingly recognized as a key strategy for fertility preservation, particularly for male infertility patients who may benefit from assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, the optimal abstinence period for maximizing semen quality prior to cryopreservation remains unclear, and whether this optimum varies with patient age has not been systematically investigated. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed semen parameters from male patients who underwent sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation at Guangdong Provincial Reproductive Hospital. Patients were stratified by age (<40 years vs. ≥40 years). Semen samples were collected after different abstinence durations (0-2, 3-5, 6-7 and ≥7 days). Sperm quality indicators-including volume, concentration, motility, and progressive motility-were compared across abstinence groups within each age stratum. Results: Results showed that among patients aged over 40 years, sperm quality was optimal after 0-2 days of abstinence despite reductions in semen volume and concentration. By contrast, in younger patients (under 40 years), the highest semen quality was observed following 3-5 days of abstinence. Additionally, prolonged abstinence periods were linked to unstable semen quality in the older patient group, making them less ideal candidates for sperm cryopreservation. Discussion: This study is the first to demonstrate that the relationship between abstinence duration and sperm quality is strongly modified by patient age. Our findings indicate that older patients achieve better and more consistent outcomes with shorter abstinence. The findings offer new perspectives for guiding sperm cryopreservation and determining the optimal timing for sperm retrieval in patients of different age groups to improve sperm quality and increase success rates in assisted reproductive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.