ArticleFrontiers in transplantation2026
Barriers and facilitators to developing an equity dashboard to identify disparities in kidney transplant access: a mixed methods study.
Article in Frontiers in transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While kidney transplant disparities are well-documented, little is known about disparities in the evaluation process after referral. Electronic dashboards interfacing with electronic health records can disaggregate patient data to identify potential avenues for reducing disparities. This cross-sectional study assessed contextual and design factors that would inform implementation of an 'Equity Dashboard' at one transplant center. Methods: Clinicians, implementation science experts, and patients were interviewed. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Quantitative data comprised primarily descriptive survey data collected during interviews. Results: Twenty clinicians/experts and 23 patients participated. Perceived facilitators included: Inner Setting constructs of mission alignment, culture, tension for change, compatibility, and structural characteristics; and Individual Characteristics construct of high-level leaders. Dashboard alignment was expected with institutional commitment to patient-centered care, center workflow, and leadership support. Perceived barriers included: Intervention Characteristics construct of costs; and Inner Setting constructs of access to knowledge and information, information technology infrastructure, and work infrastructure. Financial costs were expected to support information technology development, staff training and time, and interventions arising from dashboard findings. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that perceived barriers were largely modifiable while perceived facilitators were immutable and integral to the institution, which would facilitate dashboard implementation. Future research will evaluate dashboard implementation on patients' transplant access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.