ArticleHong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT2026
Improving Research Engagement in Occupational Therapy: Results of an International Consultation.
Article in Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aims of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) include the promotion of research for advancing public protection and access to quality evidence-informed occupational therapy. As a Federation of occupational therapy organisations, WFOT was requested by national member associations to conduct a global consultation to assist them in engaging occupational therapists in research in their country by identifying priority issues and sharing research participation strategies. Method: A two-phase mixed methods study involving an online needs analysis survey of representatives of each national member organisation of WFOT; followed by a consultation with WFOT member organisation representatives attending a WFOT Council meeting to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) for research engagement. Results: Strengths for research engagement were identified as the broad scope of practice of occupational therapy; growing research capacity; and increasing access to evidence. Weaknesses included the availability of time and resources; and access to external supports. SWOT participants identified opportunities for developing a robust research culture within the profession, as well as strategies to continue to promote access to research evidence. Threats to occupational therapist research engagement centred upon low expectations among some occupational therapy stakeholders regarding the use and generation of research. Conclusions: Findings suggest a culture change is needed to better involve occupational therapists in research. Building research capacity is dependent not only upon nurturing individual research skills and motivation, but also on advocating for organisations involved with the profession to foster, produce and use research. Recommendations for key occupational therapy stakeholders were identified from the findings to create not only the required research competence and confidence, but also the environments and supports that are conducive to such involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.