ArticleDigital health
MRI radiomics-based machine learning model for complete response classification after chemoradiotherapy in advanced rectal cancer.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Accurate identification of complete response (CR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is essential for selecting candidates for watch-and-wait treatment in advanced rectal cancer. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics-based machine learning model to classify CR and Non-CR in post-NCRT rectal MRI images. Methods: Using region-of-interest masks, 107 radiomic features were extracted and normalized to a 0-1 range using min-max scaling. Four feature selection methods (ANOVA, RFE, SBS, and LASSO) were paired with four classifiers (LR, SVM, RF, and XGB), and all combinations were evaluated through 5-fold cross-validation in the training set using mean ROC AUC as the comparison metric. Results: Among 16 combinations, RFE + SVM achieved the highest cross-validation AUC of 0.89. On an independent test set, the model achieved a sensitivity of 0.84, specificity of 0.80, accuracy of 0.82, and F1-score of 0.82. The most informative features were intensity and local texture features, including TotalEnergy, 10Percentile, Coarseness, Strength, Correlation, ZoneEntropy, and Idmn. Conclusions: MRI radiomics combined with machine learning shows preliminary promise as an exploratory approach for classifying CR and Non-CR after NCRT in rectal cancer. Given the retrospective, single-center design and the absence of external validation, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary, and prospective multicenter validation is required before clinical implementation. A multicenter external validation integrating endoscopy and digital rectal examination findings is planned to enhance generalizability and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.