ArticleHealth science reports2026
Investigation of the Reasons for the Non-Return of Lapsed Blood Donors: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Retaining and re-engaging blood donors to ensure a safe and sufficient blood supply is a key responsibility of the Blood Transfusion Organization. This study aimed to investigate the reasons for the non-return of lapsed blood donors to facilitate their re-engagement. Methods: This qualitative study, conducted in 2024, employed a conventional content analysis approach using four focused group discussions (FGDs) and individual interviews with seven lapsed blood donors selected purposefully. The credibility and reliability of the qualitative data were ensured through techniques such as maximum variation sampling, member checking, peer review, and the use of participant quotes. The interviews were recorded, manually coded, and categorized. Data analysis was carried out using Colaizzi's seven-step method. Results: In total, 34 individuals participated in this study. The reasons for non-return included 94 initial codes, 26 subcategories, and 8 categories (medical and non-medical health-related reasons, life responsibilities, changes in attitude toward blood donation, blood donation with others, desire to perform wet cupping for ideological reasons and community recommendations, beliefs about blood donation, organizational limitations, and cultural awareness). These were grouped into three main themes: individual reasons, social determinants of blood donation, and social marketing of blood donation. Conclusion: By understanding the individual needs of donors, community beliefs, and expectations, it is possible to promote a culture of blood donation through appropriate advertising and the production of up-to-date content in governmental and social media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.