ArticleFrontiers in drug delivery2026
Engineering a medical device for intranasal immunisation: ensuring targeted delivery and formulation stability.
Article in Frontiers in drug delivery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The efficacy of nasal vaccination critically depends on the delivery method, which must ensure precise and reproducible deposition of the vaccine within the nasal cavity to effectively stimulate mucosal immune structures such as the nasal\x{2011}associated lymphoid tissue (NALT). Transitioning from pre\x{2011}clinical models to human applications is challenging because of anatomical and physiological differences in nasal structure and airflow dynamics. Methods: We developed a nasal\x{2011}spray device specifically designed for human nasal immunization. The device delivers a broad, homogeneous spray that is confined to the nasal cavity, thereby avoiding the lower respiratory tract and minimizing the risk of pulmonary exposure. It was engineered to be compatible with a wide range of vaccine formulations, preserving their physicochemical properties, stability, and delivery efficacy. To overcome the limitations of conventional rodent models, the device was validated using (i) in\x{2011}vitro human nasal cavity replicas (nasal casts) and (ii) an in\x{2011}vivo rabbit model, which is more appropriate for regulatory and translational studies. Results: The spray system achieved consistent, homogeneous deposition throughout the nasal cavity without spill\x{2011}over into the lower airways. Compatibility tests confirmed that the device does not alter the physicochemical characteristics or stability of a representative complex vaccine formulation. Validation in nasal casts and the rabbit model demonstrated reproducible delivery performance and supported the device\x{2019}s suitability for human use. Discussion: The presented transitory delivery platform offers a scalable, safe, and formulation\x{2011}compatible solution for intranasal vaccine administration. By ensuring targeted deposition and preserving vaccine integrity, the device reinforces the potential of mucosal immunization strategies across diverse indications and facilitates the translation of nasal vaccines from pre\x{2011}clinical research to clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.