ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Self-reported pain on a digital workplace assessment: identifying the score that flags desk-based workers for earlier occupational health review.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Musculoskeletal pain is common among desk-based workers and reduces productivity, increases healthcare use, and contributes to work disability. Digital workplace platforms now record self-reported pain at scale, offering a way to use a single score to flag workers for earlier review, yet evidence on the lowest score at which pain is consistently associated with functional impact across multiple domains is lacking. This study aimed to identify that point. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of de-identified data from 11,529 working adults reporting pain who completed digital desk-based musculoskeletal assessments between January and November 2025. Pain was self-reported on an 11-point scale (0-10) with defined verbal descriptors at each level (a descriptive pain scale). Five functional domains were examined: productivity impairment, healthcare-seeking, mental health impact, social participation, and work absenteeism. Logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals, with a score of 1 as reference, adjusted for age and sex and with cluster-robust standard errors accounting for clustering of workers within employing organisations (116 organisations); generalised estimating equations were used as confirmation. Results: A pain score of 4 was the lowest level at which four of the five domains, productivity, healthcare-seeking, mental health, and social participation, were significantly associated with pain after adjustment and clustering (all Conclusion: A self-reported pain score of 4 was the lowest level at which functional impact was consistently associated with pain across four independent domains, robust to age, sex, and organisational clustering. These cross-sectional associations may inform use of a score of 4 on this anchored scale to prompt earlier review; they do not establish that intervening changes outcomes, and the threshold is specific to this anchored scale. Prospective studies are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.