Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42682660›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2026

Magnesium and kidney stones: a concise narrative review.

Martin Scoglio, Matteo Bargagli, Daniel G Fuster

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin ScoglioDepartment of Nephrology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2566-3524
Matteo BargagliDepartment of Nephrology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Daniel G FusterDepartment of Nephrology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7220-1803

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnesium is a potentially relevant factor in kidney stone disease (KSD), particularly in calcium-containing stones. This narrative review summarizes magnesium metabolism, its anti-lithogenic mechanisms, and the current evidence on supplementation in KSD. Magnesium may reduce stone risk through intestinal oxalate binding, inhibition of calcium oxalate crystallization, and increased urinary citrate excretion. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase (up to April 2026) identified interventional and observational studies evaluating magnesium and urinary or clinical outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE framework, and the review followed SANRA guidance. Fifteen studies were included, comprising metabolic studies, observational analyses, and four randomized controlled trials. Observational studies consistently report an inverse association between urinary magnesium and stone risk. Interventional studies show improvements in urinary parameters, including increased magnesium and citrate excretion and reduced oxalate, particularly when taken with meals. However, randomized evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Current evidence does not support routine magnesium supplementation over established therapies such as potassium citrate. Nevertheless, magnesium, especially citrate-containing formulations, may be considered in selected patients, including those with hypomagnesuria, hypocitraturia, or intolerance to potassium salts. Larger, high-quality randomized trials are needed.

Indexed as

kidney stone diseasemagnesiummagnesium citratenephrolithiasisurinary citrateurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID42682660
PMCPMC13529825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.