ReviewClinical kidney journal2026
Magnesium and kidney stones: a concise narrative review.
Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnesium is a potentially relevant factor in kidney stone disease (KSD), particularly in calcium-containing stones. This narrative review summarizes magnesium metabolism, its anti-lithogenic mechanisms, and the current evidence on supplementation in KSD. Magnesium may reduce stone risk through intestinal oxalate binding, inhibition of calcium oxalate crystallization, and increased urinary citrate excretion. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase (up to April 2026) identified interventional and observational studies evaluating magnesium and urinary or clinical outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE framework, and the review followed SANRA guidance. Fifteen studies were included, comprising metabolic studies, observational analyses, and four randomized controlled trials. Observational studies consistently report an inverse association between urinary magnesium and stone risk. Interventional studies show improvements in urinary parameters, including increased magnesium and citrate excretion and reduced oxalate, particularly when taken with meals. However, randomized evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Current evidence does not support routine magnesium supplementation over established therapies such as potassium citrate. Nevertheless, magnesium, especially citrate-containing formulations, may be considered in selected patients, including those with hypomagnesuria, hypocitraturia, or intolerance to potassium salts. Larger, high-quality randomized trials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.