ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Timing of hospice care initiation and aggressive care utilization in patients with cancer: a retrospective nationwide study in Korea.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Timely hospice initiation may reduce aggressive end-of-life (EOL) care, but studies on this topic are limited. This study investigated the association between time-to-hospice use and aggressive care utilization at EOL in terminally ill patients with cancer. Methods: Using linked K-CURE claims and cancer registry data, this retrospective cohort study in South Korea included cancer patients who received hospice care between 2015 and 2022. Hospice timing was defined as the interval between the last systemic anticancer therapy (SACT), including cytotoxic chemotherapy, hormonal/endocrine therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, and the first use of hospice care. The interval was categorized as ≤ 30 days, 31-60 days, 61-90 days, and >90 days. Aggressive care outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission, emergency department (ED) visits ≥2 times, and a composite measure of these outcomes occurring before hospice initiation. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables. Results: Among 37,996 hospice users, 54.7% initiated hospice care more than 30 days after their last SACT, and this proportion exceeded 50% throughout most of the study period. The proportion initiating hospice care >90 days after the last SACT increased over time (annual percentage change, 8.2%; Conclusions: Delayed hospice initiation was associated with increased use of aggressive EOL care, supporting the need for timely transition to hospice care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.