ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Real-world efficacy and safety profile of low-dose cadonilimab in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer as first-line therapy.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cadonilimab, a bispecific PD-1/CTLA-4 antibody, has activity in recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer (R/M CC), but high costs limit accessibility, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Hence, we aimed to assess whether lower dose of cadonilimab may achieve comparable clinical outcomes with improved tolerability. Methods: This retrospective real-world study evaluated 137 R/M CC patients treated with cadonilimab 6mg/kg every three weeks as first-line therapy at Sichuan Cancer center from January 1, 2023, to September 30, 2025. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Among 133 efficacy-evaluable patients, the ORR was 55.6%, consisting of complete and partial responses in 10.5% and 45.1% of patients, respectively. The DCR was 83.5%. In patients aged ≥65 years, the ORR and DCR were 47.8% and 87.0%, respectively. The 12-month OS rate was 92.1% (95% CI, 86.5%-98.0%), and the 12-month PFS rate was 67.3% (95% CI, 58.4%-77.4%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 78.8% and the most common were neutropenia, anemia, and lymphopenia. While immune-related adverse events were observed in 35.0% of patients, severe events were rare, occurring in only 3.6%. Furthermore, clinical outcomes and safety profiles were comparable across different chemotherapy regimens. Conclusions: Low-dose cadonilimab demonstrates robust efficacy and manageable safety in R/M CC, with encouraging outcomes in elderly patients. Prospective randomized trials are needed to validate the efficacy of dose-reduced strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.