ArticleHealth science reports2026
AI-Enhanced System for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Localization and Classification Using Multi-Scale Neural CNN Model.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), which heal slowly because of inadequate blood supply, are among the serious infections and chronic foot problems that can result from diabetes mellitus (DM). The primary consequence of DFU, which can result in amputation if left untreated. Methods: The paper proposes an intelligent and automated approach for classifying foot images as either healthy or DFU images. At the initial stage, the proposed system presents a novel dataset containing 5500 foot images collected from diverse individuals with healthy and DFU conditions. The preprocessing stage involves three steps: the Region of Interest (ROI) method removes unnecessary portions of the foot images, the RGB images are converted to grayscale, and Non-Local Means (NLM) filtering is applied to reduce noise and remove unwanted information. Two neural feature extractors, ResNet50 and Faster R-CNN, are used to independently extract features from the foot images, and the resulting feature vectors are integrated into a single fused feature. The softmax function of Faster RCNN method classifies DFU or normal image using fused features, and bounding box method regressor function localize the ulcer region from DFU image. Results: Compared with relevant state-of-the-art methods, the proposed Faster RCNN-based deep learning approach with feature fusion demonstrates superior performance in DFU recognition, achieving a testing accuracy of 99.85%, specificity of 99.37%, and precision of 99.50%. With a detection accuracy of 98.83%, this fusion-based approach demonstrated competitive performance through the use of a generalization validation mechanism. Conclusion: For automated diabetic foot ulcer identification and localization, the suggested fusion-based Faster R-CNN framework shows very accurate and dependable performance. These results point to its significant potential as a helpful clinical decision-making tool for the early identification and treatment of DFU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.