ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Value driven co-design of smart sportswear for heat illness prevention in tropical regions.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heat illness poses a serious health risk for endurance athletes in tropical climates, yet smart sportswear solutions integrating wearable digital health functions remain underexplored in low-resource settings. Objective: The objective of this research was to co-design concepts for wearable technology-enabled cycling sportswear that integrate cooling, physiological monitoring, culturally responsive usability, and cost-sensitive implementation to inform heat illness prevention strategies and support future prototype development. Methods: We conducted five co-design workshops with 20 semi-professional cyclists in Sri Lanka, using the Functional-Expressive-Aesthetic (FEA) framework to elicit user needs. Participants generated 19 design concepts and prioritized features through group discussion, sticky-note voting and qualitative ranking based on perceived health impact, usability, and cost feasibility. Results: Cooling comfort emerged as the top priority, with strong preference for hybrid designs combining natural wind cooling and smart user-controllable cooling. Key cooling zones included neck/upper back and underarm/chest. Participants valued physiological monitoring when it supported actionable interventions, such as future sensor-triggered cooling and hydration prompts, rather than passive monitoring dashboards. Additional priorities included localized UI in Sinhala, simplified data visualization, and safety features such as reflective elements. Two T-shirt concepts were finalized: smart cooling with user-controlled settings and lightweight cooling packs integrated with perforated panels. Conclusions: Findings suggest that smart sportswear for low-resource tropical cycling contexts should prioritise actionable, localised, and cost-sensitive cooling interventions rather than monitoring-only functions. The study contributes concept-level design requirements for culturally responsive wearable digital health sportswear. Because the findings are based on co-design outputs and participant perceptions, the proposed health benefits remain conceptual and require prototype development, physiological validation, usability testing, and field evaluation under cycling conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.