ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Comprehensive plastome variation and RNA editing in
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mentha is an economically and medicinally important genus in Lamiaceae, but its taxonomy and species delimitation remain challenging because of frequent hybridization, polyploidy, and marked morphological plasticity. Methods: In this study, we comparatively analyzed 12 plastomes representing major Mentha species, hybrid taxa, and unresolved accessions, including four newly assembled genomes, to characterize plastome structure, repeat composition, sequence divergence, phylogenetic relationships, and plastid RNA editing. The Results: The plastomes were highly conserved in overall organization, ranging from 151,824 to 152,154 bp and displaying the typical quadripartite structure. Gene content and order were largely stable across taxa, with only minor variation likely associated with annotation differences at IR/SC boundary regions. Codon usage analysis revealed a clear bias toward A/U-ending synonymous codons, and most shared protein-coding genes showed low Ka/Ks ratios, indicating predominant purifying selection. Repeat analyses showed that simple sequence repeats were mainly composed of A/T-rich mononucleotide motifs, whereas long repeats were concentrated in the 30-40 bp size class. Comparative analyses identified six hypervariable regions, namely ccsA-ndhD, ycf1, ndhD, rpl32-trnL-UAG, rbcL-accD, and petA-psbJ, which represent promising candidate plastid markers for species discrimination. Phylogenetic analysis based on complete plastomes provided strong support for relationships among the sampled taxa and recovered a close affinity among Discussion: Together, these results expand plastid genomic resources for Mentha and provide a useful framework for phylogenetic inference, species identification, and future germplasm utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.