Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42682533›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Analysis of postpartum and other depression detection using machine learning and deep learning techniques: a systematic review.

Revathy P, Akila Victor

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Revathy PSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Akila VictorSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postpartum depression is a major pregnancy-related mental health issue. Currently, computational intelligence research is increasing rapidly for early detection. This systematic review provides a detailed analysis of previous studies based on datasets, models used in machine learning and deep learning, feature selection methods, preprocessing techniques, and performance metrics. Scholarly works were identified across various sources, and they focused on NLP approaches, multi-source data, and forecasting models. Findings show that the research area remains underdeveloped, with most investigations relying on small or single-site data and a small set of features. Although some recent studies have introduced CNN, LSTM, and Transformer models. There is still research on the use of rarely used multimodal, multilingual, and real-time data. Moreover, there are insufficient XAI methods that impede healthcare trustworthiness and real-world implementation. The study highlights critical gaps in medical testing, model generalization, standard comparisons, and diversity in datasets. Future research aims to develop an understandable, scalable PPD detection model. Upcoming investigations should prioritize large-scale, multi-source datasets, incorporate XAI and improved feature representation, and healthcare-oriented assessments.

Indexed as

deep learningmachine learningmulti-source datapostpartum depression detectiontransformer models

Identifiers

PMID42682533
PMCPMC13529931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.