SynthesisFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Analysis of postpartum and other depression detection using machine learning and deep learning techniques: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpartum depression is a major pregnancy-related mental health issue. Currently, computational intelligence research is increasing rapidly for early detection. This systematic review provides a detailed analysis of previous studies based on datasets, models used in machine learning and deep learning, feature selection methods, preprocessing techniques, and performance metrics. Scholarly works were identified across various sources, and they focused on NLP approaches, multi-source data, and forecasting models. Findings show that the research area remains underdeveloped, with most investigations relying on small or single-site data and a small set of features. Although some recent studies have introduced CNN, LSTM, and Transformer models. There is still research on the use of rarely used multimodal, multilingual, and real-time data. Moreover, there are insufficient XAI methods that impede healthcare trustworthiness and real-world implementation. The study highlights critical gaps in medical testing, model generalization, standard comparisons, and diversity in datasets. Future research aims to develop an understandable, scalable PPD detection model. Upcoming investigations should prioritize large-scale, multi-source datasets, incorporate XAI and improved feature representation, and healthcare-oriented assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.