SynthesisFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2026
From cellular regeneration toward functional integration: a 15-year bibliometric analysis of inner ear hair cell regeneration (2011-2025).
Synthesis in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensorineural hearing loss, affecting over 1.5 billion people worldwide, results largely from irreversible damage to inner ear hair cells-specialized mechanosensory receptor cells that mammals cannot spontaneously regenerate. While recent advances in gene therapy and stem cell biology have raised hopes for biological repair, the rapid expansion of research has made it difficult to identify overarching trends, knowledge gaps, and translational bottlenecks. This study provides the first bibliometric analysis focusing on inner ear hair cell regeneration, covering 1,035 publications identified from the Web of Science Core Collection after systematic screening. To ensure the robustness of the findings and assess the sensitivity of the findings to database choice, we performed cross-database validation using Scopus and PubMed, which revealed high overlap rates (82.65% for PubMed and 75.76% for Scopus) and consistent patterns in the non-overlapping subset, suggesting that the primary WoSCC-based findings are not qualitatively altered by the inclusion of literature from other major databases. Using VOSviewer and CiteSpace, we analyzed publication trajectories, country/institution contributions, collaboration networks, and keyword dynamics. The results reveal a sustained increase in annual output, with the United States and China emerging as the two most productive and collaboratively central countries in the global research network. Keyword burst analysis shows a temporal shift from structural characterization (early 2010s) to signaling pathways (mid-late 2010s), and more recently to pathological mechanisms and protective strategies (late 2010s-present), including synaptopathy, transplantation, protection, ototoxicity, replacement, autophagy, and disease. VOSviewer co-occurrence analysis further reveals thematic clusters centered on hair cell regeneration and signaling, ototoxic injury and protection, and gene therapy and delivery, suggesting a field expanding from basic mechanisms toward translational research. These findings demonstrate that the field has diversified from a predominant emphasis on cellular regeneration toward broader attention to functional reconstruction of the hair cell-spiral ganglion neuron synapse. This transition underscores a growing emphasis on multi-target synaptic integration and highlights an unmet need for immune-compatible, subtype-specific gene delivery systems. Overall, this analysis, supplemented by cross-database consistency checks, provides a quantitative roadmap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.