ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026
Multimodal MRI biomarkers and machine learning in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a review.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system that can result in substantial cumulative neurological disability. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a central role in lesion detection, differential diagnosis, and longitudinal assessment. However, conventional MRI may not fully capture subtle tissue damage and may show substantial overlap with related inflammatory demyelinating disorders in clinically ambiguous cases. Reliable imaging biomarkers reflecting disease burden, progression, and prognosis remain limited. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on conventional MRI features and advanced quantitative MRI biomarkers in NMOSD. We found that advanced techniques, including diffusion tensor imaging, morphometric analyses of T1 imaging, and resting-state functional MRI have revealed structural, microstructural, and functional abnormalities beyond lesions visible on conventional MRI. Furthermore, imaging-based machine learning applications have shown promising performance in differential diagnosis, particularly in distinguishing NMOSD from multiple sclerosis. However, findings across studies vary in the distribution, magnitude, and clinical relevance of reported abnormalities, likely reflecting differences in disease stage, acquisition protocols, and analytical methods. Additionally, most available studies remain limited by small cohorts, methodological heterogeneity, and insufficient external validation. Evidence for relapse prediction and treatment monitoring remains comparatively limited. Future research should prioritize multicenter prospective validation, harmonized imaging protocols, clearer separation of disease subgroups, and integration of imaging with clinical, serological, cerebrospinal fluid, and ophthalmic biomarkers before routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.