ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
PINN-FFD: physics- and frequency-informed one-stage detector for brain tumor detection in MRI.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate brain tumor detection from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for clinical treatment planning. Existing one-stage detectors are purely data-driven and may produce spatially fragmented or noise-sensitive predictions under limited training data. We propose PINN-FFD, a physics- and frequency-informed extension of YOLO that constructs a continuous tumor occupancy heatmap from bounding-box outputs and jointly optimizes (i) a Laplacian smoothness constraint inspired by physics-informed neural networks and (ii) a frequency-domain penalty that suppresses high-frequency spectral energy in the predicted tumor field. Unlike conventional PINN approaches that solve PDE-based reconstruction tasks, PINN-FFD imposes field-level priors directly on detection outputs without modifying the YOLO backbone. On a brain tumor MRI dataset of 500 annotated 2D slices (400/50/50 train/validation/test split), PINN-FFD achieves precision/recall/mAP@0.5 of 0.901/0.871/0.893, outperforming the YOLO11n baseline (0.797/0.878/0.853) by +13.0% in precision and +4.7% in mAP@0.5 while maintaining comparable recall (0.871 vs. 0.878) and reducing heatmap L2 error to 0.015. Ablation, hyperparameter, and computational analyses confirm the contribution of each module and the feasibility of lightweight clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.