SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Rational decisions or moral obligations? A systematic review of TPB-NAM integration in understanding low-carbon behavior.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Understanding low-carbon behavior remains a significant challenge due to the complexity of environmental decision-making and the persistent intention-behavior gap. While the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Norm Activation Model (NAM) are among the most widely applied frameworks for explaining environmental behavior, studies increasingly integrate these theories to capture both rational and moral dimensions of decision-making. This study systematically reviews TPB-NAM integration research to identify major research trends, theoretical integration approaches, and implications for understanding the psychological mechanisms underlying low-carbon behavior. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using 225 peer-reviewed articles retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. Bibliometric and content analysis techniques were employed using Bibliometrix, VOSviewer, and Scimago Graphica to examine publication trends, research hotspots, application contexts, dependent variables, and integration pathways between TPB and NAM. Results: The findings reveal a substantial increase in TPB-NAM integration studies since 2019, reflecting growing interest in environmentally responsible behavior. Sustainable consumption, waste management, and sustainable transportation emerged as the most frequently investigated contexts. Behavioral intention remained the dominant dependent variable, accounting for 85.4% of studies, whereas actual behavior received comparatively limited attention. Four major integration pathways were identified, namely awareness of consequences → attitude, subjective norm → personal norm, awareness of consequences → subjective norm, and social norm → personal norm. Furthermore, 62.0% of studies adopted a simple combination of TPB and NAM without establishing clear theoretical linkages between constructs. Conclusion: The findings suggest that TPB and NAM represent complementary rather than competing perspectives for understanding environmental behavior. The identified integration pathways highlight the interaction of cognitive evaluation, social influence, and moral regulation in shaping low-carbon behavior. By synthesizing existing evidence, this review advances understanding of the psychological foundations of environmental behavior and provides directions for future research aimed at addressing the intention-behavior gap and promoting sustainable behavioral change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.