Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42682449›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics for prediction of 6-month local thermal ablation response in benign thyroid nodules: a multicenter study.

Xiaowan Bo, Zhuoran Wang, Chongke Zhao, Chaonan Li, Songyuan Yu, Jing Guo, Huihui Chai, Chengzhong Peng, Jiangang Chen, Jun Luo and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiaowan Bo *Department of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Zhuoran Wang *Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Chongke Zhao *Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chaonan LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Songyuan YuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jing GuoDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Huihui ChaiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Chengzhong PengDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jiangang ChenShanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Jun LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Liping SunDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Huixiong XuShanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML)-based ultrasound (US) radiomics model for prediction of 6-month local treatment response (LTR) ofthermal ablation (TA) for benign thyroid nodules (BTNs). Methods: Between January 2018 and July 2021, a total of 388 patients who underwent US-guided TA in three centers were included. US radiomics features were extracted from preoperative grayscale US images and data dimensionality reduced using principal component analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Then, support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression, a decision tree, K-nearest neighbors, and random forest were applied to selected key US radiomics features for distinguishing a volume reduction ratio (VRR) ≥50% or <50%. Factors affecting 6-month LTR were assessed using multivariate logistic regression to construct a clinical model. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted to compare the predictive performance between radiomics-based ML and clinical models. Results: At 6 months post-ablation, patients with VRR ≥ 50% were 75.8% (292/372) in the training and internal test cohorts and 59.4% (19/32) in the external test cohort. Finally, 10 US radiomics features were selected for analysis. Solidity was the only independent clinical predictor associated with VRR<50%. Among the five algorithms, the SVM model achieved the optimal predictive efficacy, with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.81 in the internal test set. The AUC of the SVM-based US radiomics model was significantly higher than that of the clinical model in both internal (0.81 vs. 0.63, P< 0.05) and external test cohorts (0.77 vs. 0.54, P< 0.05). Conclusion: The SVM-based US radiomicsmodel yielded a satisfactory performance for predicting the 6-month LTR, outperforming the clinical model, and facilitating decision-making in favor of TA.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesMachine LearningRadiomicsThyroid NoduleAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesSupport Vector MachineTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographybenign thyroid nodulesmachine learningradiomicsthermal ablationultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42682449
PMCPMC13529534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.