Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42682448›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Urban environmental exposure as a factor in adaptive neuromodulation: a conceptual framework.

Aurela Qamili, Anja Cenameri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aurela QamiliDepartment of Engineering, Albanian University, Tirana, Albania.
Anja CenameriDepartment of Engineering, Albanian University, Tirana, Albania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban neuromodulation and neurofeedback systems have become increasingly adaptive and closed-loop. However, they still focus primarily on brain signals and often ignore the urban areas where these signals happen. The framework introduced in this study integrates EEG, physiological measures, indicators of environmental exposures, and GIS spatial analysis. Our goal is to incorporate Local Climate Zone classification into one unified cycle of user-specific interpretation. Contrary to the typical methodology in digital exposomes and environmental neuroscience, where the individual-to-environment relationship is assessed for exposure or well-being purposes, our approach treats urban exposure directly as an input to neurofeedback adaptation. In this respect, the proposal involves using EEG together with biological signals, along with spatial and environmental exposure metrics. According to the principal hypothesis, the use of spatial and environmental exposure data may help to lower ambiguity in the interpretation of the neurophysiological signal. The article is organized around four interconnected layers. They are environmental exposure, human sensing, AI-based fusion, and adaptive feedback. The layers describe the model through a non-clinical use case and examine major ethical, technical, and social challenges. The suggested architecture is conceptual and non-clinical. The aim is to orient future empirical and translational studies rather than to report already validated outcomes. The main contribution of the framework is the use of urban exposure as an active contextual input for interpreting brain-body states and guiding adaptive feedback, instead of treating the environment as background noise.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecontext-aware neuromodulationdigital exposomeEEGenvironmental neuroscienceGISlocal climate zonesneuroarchitecture

Identifiers

PMID42682448
PMCPMC13529496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.