ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Omission of frozen section in sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cN0 HER2-positive and TNBC.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Axillary management in breast cancer has shifted significantly with the increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), particularly in biologically aggressive subtypes such as HER2-positive breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Intraoperative frozen section evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) has traditionally guided axillary dissection, but recent evidence suggests that omitting axillary dissection in patients with minimal or no residual disease provides comparable local control when combined with axillary radiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate whether intraoperative frozen section or paraffin section assessment affects axillary management in patients who are clinically node negative (cN0) before NACT. Methods: This retrospective study included 83 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer or TNBC treated between 2023 and 2025. All patients were clinically and radiologically node negative prior to NACT. SLN biopsy was performed using isosulfan blue, dual technique, indocyanine green, or combinations. Intraoperative frozen section analysis was performed in 59 patients, while paraffin section was used in 24 patients. Clinicopathological features, SLN positivity, pathological response rates, axillary recurrence, and surgical decisions were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: The mean age was 48.2 years. A pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 71% of patients, of whom 96.6% had negative SLNs. Among patients with partial response, 75% had negative SLNs. SLN positivity was observed in 8.5% (n = 5) of patients in the frozen section group and 12.5% (n = 3) in the paraffin section group. Axillary dissection was performed only in the frozen section group. No axillary recurrences occurred in either group after a median follow-up of 22 months. Paraffin section evaluation did not result in delayed treatment or increased recurrence. Conclusion: In HER2-positive and TNBC patients with cN0 status before NACT and a good pathological response, frozen section analysis of SLNs does not influence surgical decision-making. Paraffin section evaluation may represent a feasible alternative in carefully selected patients with HER2-positive breast cancer or TNBC who achieve an excellent response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously given the retrospective design, small sample size, and relatively short follow-up, and require validation in larger prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.