ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
NED-oriented oncology in metastatic breast cancer: a hypothesis-driven framework integrating the tumor immune microenvironment, antibody-drug conjugates, and metastasis-directed therapy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has traditionally been managed as an incurable systemic disease in which the main goals are survival extension, symptom control, and preservation of quality of life. This principle remains appropriate for most patients. However, contemporary systemic therapies, high-resolution imaging, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), immune checkpoint inhibition, liquid biopsy, and metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) have made prolonged no evidence of disease (NED) clinically recognizable in selected patients. This Hypothesis and Theory article proposes NED-oriented oncology as a testable framework for carefully selected patients with MBC. The central premise is that complete response and NED should be separated conceptually: complete response is a radiological treatment-response category, whereas NED is a clinical state produced by the integration of systemic disease control, biological remodeling of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), and local eradication of all residual visible lesions. We propose a Clinical NED Score to structure candidate selection, a TIME-modifiability layer to estimate biological convertibility, and a five-step algorithm in which systemic therapy is used to generate deep response and immune-ecological remodeling before MDT is considered at maximal response. ADCs are discussed as potential tumor-ecosystem engineering tools because their effects may extend beyond direct cytotoxicity to bystander killing, immunogenic cell death, antigen release, and immune reconfiguration. This framework does not imply that MBC is broadly curable. Rather, it argues that durable NED is a clinically meaningful, prospectively testable state that should be distinguished from transient radiological response and evaluated using endpoints such as NED interval, polymetastatic progression-free survival, systemic therapy switch-free survival, ctDNA-negative duration, and quality-of-life preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.