ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Performance evaluation of electrosurgical pencils: insights into surgical smoke mitigation and thermal damage reduction.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Electrosurgical pencils (ESPs) are essential in modern surgery; however, concerns remain regarding their exposure to surgical smoke and thermal tissue damage. This study quantitatively evaluated four ESPs with a particular focus on two critical aspects: surgical smoke generation and minimization of thermal damage to the surrounding tissues. Methods: Full-thickness incisions were made on the porcine dorsal skin using six instruments: scalpel, uncoated Bovie, coated Bovie, PlasmaBlade, and Duoblade (with and without suction). Surgical smoke was measured by particle counting, blood loss was quantified, and histological analyses (hematoxylin and eosin, Masson's trichrome, CD3, and α-smooth muscle actin staining) were performed to assess the wound scar width and densities of CD3-positive lymphocytes and myofibroblasts. Results: Duoblades, especially those with suction, consistently produced the lowest level of surgical smoke, reducing particle counts by up to 96.1% compared to the uncoated Bovie. It also achieved the greatest reduction in blood loss (93.3% less than that of the scalpel) and resulted in the narrowest scar width among the ESPs. The wound scar width and densities of CD3-positive lymphocytes and myofibroblasts were reduced more rapidly in Duoblade-incised wounds than in those with other ESPs. Discussion: Device design and energy delivery significantly affect the surgical smoke and tissue outcomes. Duoblade dielectric heating and integrated suction provide superior environmental safety and wound healing, while maintaining excellent hemostasis. The Duoblade has a suction function that reduces the surgical smoke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.