ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Improving pediatric hip fracture detection using deep learning: multicenter validation and clinical reader study.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To develop and evaluate a deep learning model for automated localization and diagnosis of femoral neck fractures in children under 8 years of age using hip radiographs. Materials and Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 794 hip radiographs from 640 pediatric patients (median age, 4.1 years; 62.5% male) collected from four tertiary hospitals between June 2013 and December 2024. A YOLOv11-based object detection model was trained on 712 radiographs and externally validated on 82 radiographs. Diagnostic performance was measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. A multi-reader study was conducted using the external test set, where five physicians (two senior radiologists, one junior radiologist, two emergency physicians) interpreted radiographs with and without AI assistance. Statistical analysis included DeLong's test, McNemar tests, and Fleiss' κ. Results: The model achieved AUROCs of 0.911 (95% CI: 0.864-0.949) on the internal test set and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.792-0.935) on the external test set. Sensitivity and specificity were 84.9% and 85.5% internally, and 80.8% and 91.1% externally. Among junior readers, AI assistance significantly improved diagnostic accuracy (mean ΔAUROC = + 0.083; Conclusion: A YOLOv11-based deep learning model accurately detected femoral neck fractures in children and significantly improved diagnostic accuracy and consistency among less experienced readers. These findings support its integration as a real-time assistive tool in pediatric trauma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.