ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Interpretable machine learning model predicts the early gastrointestinal dysfunction risk in severely burned patients: a multicenter-based study.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction is a life-threatening complication following severe burn injury, significantly increasing risks of multi-organ failure and mortality. This study aimed to develop and validate the first machine learning (ML)-based clinical prediction model for GI dysfunction after severe burns by leveraging explainable artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to support early clinical intervention. Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, 570 patients with severe burns were enrolled: 469 from Hospital A [randomly split into training ( Results: Among 570 patients, the incidence of GI dysfunction was 35.61% (203/570). The XGBoost algorithm showed superior discrimination, with an AUC of 0.910 (95% CI: 0.878-0.941) in the training set, 0.851 (0.790-0.913) in the internal validation set, and 0.908 (0.837-0.979) in the external validation set. SHAP analysis identified five key predictors by importance: SOFA score, TBSA, inhalation injury, blood culture result, and hematuria. Conclusion: We developed and validated the first interpretable ML-based model for predicting GI dysfunction after severe burn injury, with XGBoost achieving high performance. This model could help identify high-risk patients for personalized pre-emptive management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.