Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42682356›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026

Development of a deep-learning model to detect free air on abdominal computed tomography for surgical decision support.

Sangwook Kim, Sin Hye Park, Joonghyup Lee, Hayemin Lee, Dong Jin Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sangwook KimAI Research Lab, NT SCOPY, Korea.
Sin Hye ParkDepartment of Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Joonghyup LeeAI Research Lab, NT SCOPY, Korea.
Hayemin LeeDepartment of Surgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Jin KimDepartment of Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Free air (FA) in the abdominal cavity is a critical finding requiring prompt surgical intervention. We developed an AI-based segmentation model, Free Air-Net (FA-NET), to detect FA in abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans and further refined it with negative training to create FA-NET-NT, aiming to reduce false positives. Materials and methods: FA-NET-NT was developed using a retrospective dataset from a single institution ( Results: Both models achieved high Dice scores (0.87). FA-NET-NT improved specificity (96%) while maintaining high sensitivity (85%) in image-wise analysis. In patient-wise analysis, FA-NET-NT achieved 95-96% sensitivity for ulcer perforation and 82-92% specificity for non-FA conditions (cholecystitis, pancreatitis, and appendicitis). Specificity for ileus remained moderate (62%). In the external validation, the model demonstrated a patient-wise sensitivity of 95% for ulcer perforation. High specificity was maintained against differential diagnoses, including appendicitis (88%), pancreatitis (88%), cholecystitis (82%), and ileus (80%). Most false-positive findings were attributable to physiological bowel gas mimicking FA. Conclusion: FA-NET-NT is a robust decision-support tool for detecting FA, with its generalizability confirmed through multi-institutional validation. To provide definitive evidence of its clinical superiority, further prospective multi-center trials are necessary in emergency settings.

Indexed as

computed tomographydeep learningpeptic ulcer

Identifiers

PMID42682356
PMCPMC13336583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.