ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Unplanned interventions following bariatric surgery: first cohort outcomes from the National Emergency Bariatric Surgery Audit (NEBSA).
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the increasing volume of bariatric surgery, patterns of management following complications are poorly characterized in national datasets. We present the UK data collected by the National Emergency Bariatric Surgery Audit on patient characteristics following treatment for bariatric surgery complications, concentrating on 30-day mortality, complication severity, threshold for intensive care unit (ITU)/ high dependency unit (HDU) care, and postoperative follow-up. These data seek to inform the design of new clinical studies, support service development, and address surgical training requirements. Methods: A prospective, multi-center audit was conducted across UK hospitals from October 2023 to March 2025. Adults presenting with bariatric surgery-related complications requiring urgent intervention were included. Demographics, index procedures, presentation details, and outcomes were collected using a standardized electronic tool. Results: A total of 187 patients were included. The median age was 43 years, and 85.6% were female. The most common index procedures were sleeve gastrectomy (25.7%) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (31%). A total of 34.8% of patients had undergone surgery abroad. Emergency department attendance accounted for 72.2% of presentations. Emergency surgery was needed in 86.1% of cases, with two recorded deaths (0.8%). Additionally, 14% of patients were admitted to ITU. Follow-up was arranged for 73.3% of patients. Variation was noted in follow-up plans and the threshold for ITU/HDU care. Conclusion: Emergency bariatric surgery is a distinct and growing domain within acute surgical practice. This study highlights the urgent need for standardization of treatment pathways, targeted investment, training, and national collaboration to improve outcomes in the emergency treatment of bariatric complications. The data from this cohort can provide a stepping stone to better understanding the service, training, research, and funding needs of complex bariatric emergency services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.