ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Empirical noise mapping guides optimal region-of-interest selection for accurate noise estimation in prostate DWI.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSignal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements are important for quality assurance, especially when quantitative MRI markers or new hardware are being developed or evaluated. Regions of low signal or assumed uniform signal are used for SNR estimation in a variety of MR image types, but this is unreliable due to spatial heterogeneity of noise arising from the organization of multiple-detector arrays and sensitivity encoding (SENSE) reconstruction. PURPOSE: We present a universally applicable method for empirical noise mapping by propagating simulated noise through the image-generating reconstruction pipeline, to identify optimal regions of interest (ROIs) for determining noise levels in prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).
methodsThirty-six men were imaged at 3T with DWI. K-space data were propagated through an off-line reconstruction pipeline including sensitivity encoding (SENSE), to generate DW images. Simulated complex Gaussian noise generated from prescan per-channel measurements was similarly processed to produce pure noise maps. Per-voxel standard deviations (SD) of spatial distributions of noise, averaged over prostate, internal obturator muscle (IOM), low signal (anterior and posterior), rectum, and bladder ROIs were calculated and compared to evaluate suitability for SNR estimation in prostate DWI.
resultsIOM ROI noise levels, averaged bilaterally, were not significantly different from those in the prostate. Bladder ROI noise levels were comparable. Noise levels measured in low signal areas were highly dependent on SENSE algorithm regularization strength. DISCUSSION: The proposed method can be used-on any scanner-to accurately calculate noise levels in MR images, without repeated acquisition or interference from SENSE use.
conclusionBladder and averaged IOM ROIs are appropriate for estimating DWI noise levels in the prostate. Low signal ROIs should not be used, due to the strong dependence on the SENSE regularization strength, and by extension, on the SENSE reconstruction algorithm. The presented method can be used instead to obtain accurate spatial maps of noise levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.