ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026
Understanding Barriers and Motivators of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Genetic Testing: Insights From the Singapore Public.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common monogenic disorder associated with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and premature cardiovascular disease. Despite Singapore's high FH prevalence and the launch of the National FH Genetic Testing Programme in 2025, uptake remains suboptimal. This study aimed to assess public attitudes, perceptions, and willingness to undergo FH genetic testing. A cross-sectional survey of 333 Singaporean adults was conducted. Descriptive and comparative analyses assessed willingness, concerns, and information needs. While 71% of participants expressed some willingness to test, only 25% reported strong intention. Individuals who were 'somewhat willing' exhibited aversion levels similar to those 'unwilling', reflecting ambivalence and a risk of inaction without targeted support. Insurance coverage increased willingness, whereas encouragement from health professionals or family had minimal effect. Participants with high cholesterol were more willing to test than those with normal cholesterol. Key barriers for individuals with normal and high cholesterol included concerns about cost, insurability, data privacy, emotional readiness, and perceived necessity. Information needs varied by willingness level, with those more willing prioritizing practical and logistical details while ambivalent or unwilling participants needed guidance on benefits and costs, post-test pathways, and data protection. Financial subsidies alone are insufficient to maximize uptake. Tailored communication and decision support interventions from healthcare providers addressing psychosocial and information barriers are essential to support effective implementation of national FH genetic testing programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.