ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2026
Impact of the 2024 national medical fluid shortage on urologic practice in the United States: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn September 2024, Hurricane Helene caused extensive infrastructure damage in the United States, including severe disruption to a major Baxter sterile irrigation fluid manufacturing facility in North Carolina, leading to a nationwide shortage of sterile irrigation fluids used in surgical procedures. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the nationwide sterile irrigation fluid shortage on urologic practice across the United States (U.S.).
methodsA descriptive, cross-sectional Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) survey was distributed to U.S. urologists. The questionnaire captured provider demographics, procedure delays, and practice/procedure modifications.
resultsNinety-five surgeons responded. Overall, 76.8% reported an impact on practice, and 47% were directed by hospitals to cancel or reschedule cases. Over one-third rescheduled more than 10 procedures, with a median delay of two months. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatments and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) were the most affected. About 36% noted a negative impact on physician-patient relationships. Nearly half (45.7%) modified outpatient procedures, primarily cystoscopies, using syringe irrigation or requesting patients arrive with full bladders.
resultsSurgical adjustments (40.4%) included switching from holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) to simple prostatectomy and reducing resident involvement. Postoperatively, increased catheter traction was used to limit irrigation. Twenty-nine urologists planned to retain conservation measures such as smaller fluid bags or reduced pressurized irrigation. At survey completion, 32.6% still experienced effects of the fluid shortage.
conclusionsThe 2024 national fluid shortage significantly disrupted U.S. urology practice, especially endourology cases. Urologists adopted a range of clinical and surgical strategies, some of which may persist, underscoring the need for systemic preparedness to mitigate future shortages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42682063What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.