ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2026
Testicular prosthesis complications and satisfaction rates after gender affirming scrotoplasty.
Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTesticular prosthesis implantation (TPI) is frequently performed as part of masculinizing genital gender-affirming surgery (GGAS), but complication and satisfaction data for assigned female at birth (AFAB) men remain limited. We report a single-centre experience assessing postoperative complications, explantation-free survival (EFS) and patient-reported satisfaction.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral transmasculine TPI (TM-TPI) from May 2007 to April 2025. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications (e.g., surgical-site infection, contamination, hematoma, migration, pain, extrusion) and EFS rate. Satisfaction was measured at 12 months using the 13-item Transmasculine Testicular Prosthesis Satisfaction Index (TM-TPSI), a questionnaire tool developed for this cohort.
resultsForty-four patients (mean age 40 ± 10 years) received solid silicone prostheses; median follow-up was 84.5 (IQR 65.3-95.0) months. Complications included superficial surgical-site infection in 8/44 (18%), one prosthesis contamination requiring removal, one extrusion requiring replacement, and one migration requiring repositioning (2%). Mean time to explant/reposition was 57.7 ± 61.5 months; the 5-year EFS rate was 97%. Of 41 respondents to the TM-TPSI, 84% were "mostly satisfied" or "more satisfied than unsatisfied"; the mean score was 46.0 ± 10.5.
conclusionsIn this cohort, TM-TPI showed a low rate of surgical revisions and high patient-reported satisfaction over long-term follow-up. Multicentre studies and formal validation of the TM-TPSI are warranted to refine benchmarks and enable cross-cohort comparisons. TM-TPI is a procedure that needs to be further investigated with clear specificity for AFAB men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42682057What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.