ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2026
Vulvar re-antisepsis and urinary tract infection after CO
Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether vulvar re-antisepsis before carbon dioxide (CO Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study included 98 women who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy between November 25, 2025, and March 1, 2026. All patients received routine preoperative abdominal and vulvovaginal preparation with 10% povidone-iodine. According to routine intraoperative practice and surgeon preference, 53 patients underwent standard antisepsis alone, and 45 received additional vulvar and periurethral re-antisepsis immediately before CO Results: Postoperative UTI occurred in 8 patients (15.1%) in the standard antisepsis group and in 4 patients (8.9%) in the re-antisepsis group (p=0.538). Vulvar re-antisepsis was not associated with postoperative UTI in the exploratory multivariable model [adjusted odds ratio (OR)=0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-4.23; p=0.881]. Delayed catheter removal (>6 hours) was associated with postoperative UTI (adjusted OR=12.87, 95% CI: 2.13-77.62; p=0.005). Conclusion: Vulvar re-antisepsis before CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.